Tim Pawlenty 2012 Republican Presidential Candidate

Timothy Pawlenty is currently the Governor of Minnesota.  However, in 2009, he announced he would not seek re-election in 2010.  While serving in a traditionally liberal state, the conservative Republican, Pawlenty, has been noted as “Minnesota’s Ronald Reagan.”  In 2007, Pawlenty served as co-chairman of McCain’s campaign and a year later earned a finalist position on John McCain’s Vice President list.  Many now feel he has taken additional steps that will lead to a bid for the 2012 Presidential Election by starting a political action committee and making multiple visits to New Hampshire and Iowa. Regarded as one of the nation’s most energetic, accomplished, innovative, and reform-minded governors, Pawlenty could serve as a strong 2012 Republican Nominee.   Viewed as a serious contender while compiling a remarkable record of fiscal restraint in a blue state, Pawlenty battles a Democratic legislature on a daily basis.  Competent, disciplined, smart, and likeable, he also possesses a formidable talent as one of the best communicators in modern politics.

Born and raised in Minnesota, he initially worked as a labor law attorney.  Later he served as Vice President for a software service company.  His political career started in 1988 with an appointment to a City Planning Commission and a year later elected to the City Council.  Then in 1992, Pawlenty was elected to the Minnesota House of Representatives where he served five terms.  He was also chosen as the Republican House Majority Leader in 1998.  Pawlenty was first elected as Governor of Minnesota in 2002 and then re-elected in 2006.  Throughout his tenure, Governor Pawlenty has taken several delegations of government, business, academic, and civic leaders to China, Canada, India, Israel, and the Czech Republic to promote trade relations and investment into Minnesota and to acquire market information and potential business partners.  He has also made trips to Poland, Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq, and other nations to visit deployed National Guardsmen from Minnesota.

In 2002, Pawlenty prevailed over gubernatorial challengers at the polls with campaign pledges of not raising taxes to balance Minnesota’s budget deficit, changing the state’s education requirements, mandating a 24-hour waiting period for abortions, requiring visa expiration dates on driver’s licenses, and creating a conceal-carry gun law.  In his first year, he balanced a $4.3 billion deficit by increasing state fees and reducing the rate of funding increases for state services, such as welfare, social services, and transportation.  In 2004, he invited Mexican President Vicente Fox to Minnesota in hopes of strengthening trade.  In 2005, he signed into law a bill that will raise the minimum mandated mixture of gasohol (gasoline and ethanol) from 10% to 20% in 2013.

During his second term, Pawlenty eliminated a $2.7 billion deficit by cutting spending and shifting payments.  He signed a $999.9 million public works bill in 2006 that included funding for the Northstar Commuter rail, a Faribault prison, and science facilities at Minnesota State University.  The bill also funded an expansion of the Carlson School of Management and a bioscience building at the University of Minnesota.  He raised fees and imposed toll lanes on roads to help discourage excessive traffic; several carpool lanes were transformed into high-occupancy toll lanes.  He also served as the chairperson of the National Governors Association in 2007 and 2008.  In 2009, he recommended a 3% cut in state reimbursements to physicians as a mechanism to balance the state budget.  He recently sent a letter to President Obama requesting an emergency summit to consider solutions that could protect important ecological and economic interests in regards to threatened Asian carp in the Great Lakes areas and Minnesota.

Vote in the 2012 Presidential Poll! Tim Pawlenty vs Obama!

http://2012obama.com/presidential-polls/tim-pawlenty-vs-obama-in-2012-presidential-election/

how can the GOP/senate vote for the passage of a bill [or be expected to do so] when they don’t know what i?

ihateoldyork asked:


it was mentioned on at least one newscast today that the GOP is currently blocking passage of a healthcare bill because they “don’t know” what is in the proposed bill, and in fact John McCain mentioned with no degree of certainty that there is only one person [I would assume Obama] who DOES know what is in it. But this seems to suggest that the senate could vote for, or accept passage of the bill if they wanted to, even without knowing what is in it, or that the DNC [is] expects them to do so.
Questions: 1] despite claims to the contrary, it appears that there has been no official disccusion of the bill simply because of its extreme length and time necessary to review it publicly. With that said, could the senate [legally{be required to]] vote for a bill without knowing what is in it?

2] Obama has said on several occasions that there simply needs to be passage of SOME kind of reform, which seems to suggest that he doesn’t care about specifics just as long as there is passage of some bill. If that is really the case, then why is it that there is so much covertness and resistance to change surrounding the proposed bill? It’s time to stop playing politics and get down to business once and for all.

Caffeinated Content

Is 0bama headed for the toilet?

Randa asked:


Obama: Twelve Months on, the Star Falls Back to Earth

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/obama-twelve-months-on-the-star-falls-back-to-earth-1811148.html

Last year he could do no wrong. Now he is on the stump in a desperate bid to avert a Republican fightback. David Usborne reports

Thursday, 29 October 2009

AP
President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown walk from the Oval Office of the White House in Washington

If there was a degree of déjà vu for fans of Barack Obama crammed inside a university athletic arena in Hackensack, New Jersey, the other evening, it was entirely deliberate. They only had to close their eyes and listen to the deafening chants of “Yes We Can” to imagine they had been transported back to the heady days of a year ago when their candidate was on the verge of seizing the White House and making history.

Even with open eyes they could have felt some of that old frisson. Event organisers wandered the hall wearing shirts proclaiming “Yes We Can 2.0″, as if they were selling the latest Windows update, and a giant banner stage-right gave top billing to Obama. The name beneath his, Corzine, might almost have been an afterthought.

This was not a re-election rally for Mr Obama – not yet, please – but for Jon Corzine, the former boss of Goldman Sachs and now governor of New Jersey. He had invited the president to speak because, when Jersey voters go to the polls next Tuesday – New Jersey and Virginia are the only states where governorships are in play this year – it is not at all clear that they won’t ditch him in favour of his Republican opponent, Chris Christie. The latest polls say it’s too close to call.

That’s better than in the summer when Christie had a double-digit lead. But, in the final stretch, Corzine needs to remind Democrats of the fervour of 12 months ago when they overwhelmingly chose Obama over John McCain. “One more time”, the disco beat booms before the two men arrive on stage in front of a crowd of about 3,000 eager supporters. “One more time. We’re going to celebrate. Oh yeah. Alright.” Once at the microphone, Corzine promises to be brief. “I know who you came to see,” he says.

Obama does what is required of him with his usual eloquence, speaking for 30 minutes. He looks happy to be campaigning again, relieved of Oval Office responsibilities for an afternoon, his stump oratory uncaged. But selflessness and politics do not go together. He is in New Jersey because what happens here next week will matter to him. This is an off-year for congressional races, so, rightly or wrongly, the outcome of these two gubernatorial races will be viewed by some as a first referendum on his presidency.

The President has already suffered a slow, but steady, decline in his approval ratings, so it cheers no one in the White House that the outcome in Jersey is so uncertain. In Virginia, where the President campaigned this week, the outlook is worse with most polls suggesting that the Democrat candidate, Creigh Deeds, will be walloped by his Republican rival, Bob McDonnell.

If Republicans seize the governors’ mansions in both states, the embarrassment will be acute. That is just what happened in both New Jersey and Virginia back in 1993 before the Republicans seized control of the US Congress the following year, dealing a crippling blow to the newly minted Democratic president of the time, Bill Clinton.

But even losing one of them next week will scratch the sheen of President Obama, who seems, one year on from his election, to be hovering in the view of most Americans between competent and fumbling, notwithstanding the high esteem in which he is still held abroad and, of course, in the minds of the Nobel committee.

What is certain is that the almost-mad expectations placed on Obama that unusually warm night in Chicago’s Grant Park when he delivered his victory speech last November, have given way now to a general unease about his performance in office. For sure, he has mostly avoided calamity. Not getting the Olympics for Chicago doesn’t count. Nor is his administration in disarray or anything close to it. (Mr Clinton had barely arrived in office before he was instantly engulfed in mini-scandals.) But the Obama magic that should be working to protect Democrats like Corzine and Deeds seems mostly to have leaked away.

New Jersey is a state that naturally belongs in the Democratic column. Moreover, since 1947, only two Jersey governors have failed to win a second term. But Corzine is unpopular in the state, thwacked by raising property taxes and the effects of the economic recession. “The New Jersey governor’s race is going down to the wire,” predicted the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.

Virginia had been a red state – as far as the presidency was concerned – since 1964, but it turned blue for Obama and Democrats hailed it as a s

Caffeinated Content for WordPress

When will the Harry Reid story hit the 6:00 news? Which party is led by racist’s now?

E D asked:


The top Democrat in the U.S. Senate apologized on Saturday for comments he made about Barack Obama’s race during the 2008 presidential bid and are quoted in a yet-to-be-released book about the campaign.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada described in private then-Sen. Barack Obama as “light skinned” and “with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.” Obama is the nation’s first African-American president.

“I deeply regret using such a poor choice of words. I sincerely apologize for offending any and all Americans, especially African-Americans for my improper comments,” Reid said in a statement released after the excerpts were first reported on the Web site of The Atlantic.

“I was a proud and enthusiastic supporter of Barack Obama during the campaign and have worked as hard as I can to advance President Obama’s legislative agenda.”

Reid remained neutral during the bitter Democratic primary that became a marathon contest between Obama and then-Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, whom Obama tapped as the United States’ top diplomat after the election.

Reid’s comments are included in the book, obtained Saturday by The Associated Press and set to be published on Monday. “Game Change” was written by Time Magazine’s Mark Halperin and New York magazine’s John Heilemann.

The book also says Reid urged Obama to run, perceiving the first-term senator’s impatience.

“You’re not going to go anyplace here,” Reid told Obama of the Senate. “I know that you don’t like it, doing what you’re doing.”

In another section, aides to Republican nominee John McCain described the difficulties they faced with their vice presidential pick, then-Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. Steve Schmidt, a senior member of Sen. John McCain’s presidential team, is quoted telling Palin’s foreign policy tutors: “You guys have a lot of work to do. She doesn’t know anything.”

The authors also quote Obama’s initial reaction to McCain’s selection of a little-known governor: “Wow. Well, I guess she’s change.”

Vice presidential nominee Joe Biden was direct. “Who’s Sarah Palin?” the book quotes the then-senator as asking as they left the nominating convention in Denver.

Reid, facing a tough 2010 re-election bid, needs the White House’s help if he wants to keep his seat. Obama’s administration has dispatched officials on dozens of trips to buoy his bid and Obama has raised money for his campaign.

Recognizing the threat, Reid’s apologies also played to his home state: “Moreover, throughout my career, from efforts to integrate the Las Vegas strip and the gaming industry to opposing radical judges and promoting diversity in the Senate, I have worked hard to advance issues.”

Even before his ill-considered remarks were reported, a new survey released Saturday by the Las Vegas Review Journal showed him continuing to earn poor polling numbers. In the poll, by Mason-Dixon Polling & Research, Reid trailed former state Republican party chairwoman Sue Lowden by a 10 percentage points, 50 percent to 40 percent, and also lagging behind two other opponents.

More than half of Nevadans had an unfavorable opinion of Reid. Just 33 percent of respondents held a favorable opinion.

Website content

Were you one of the 40 million viewers who tuned in to watch Sarah Palin give her top notch speech?

Francis Bacon 1626 asked:


After days of intense media coverage about Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin’s qualifications, more than 40 million Americans tuned in Wednesday to see for themselves what they thought of her.

The huge audience for Palin’s acceptance speech rivaled that for Obama’s address at the Democratic National Convention six days earlier, and set a tough standard for the top of her own ticket. John McCain was to accept the GOP presidential nomination on Thursday.

The first two days of the GOP convention essentially served as a build-up for Palin. The Alaska governor hadn’t spoken publicly since McCain selected her for the ticket last Friday, as a series of stories circulated questioning whether McCain had properly vetted her.

Her poised speech, primarily going after Obama and touting McCain’s case for the presidency, was gushed over by many analysts.

An audience of 37.2 million people watched Palin on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox News Channel and MSNBC, Nielsen Media Research said Thursday. PBS estimated its audience at 3.9 million, based on a less reliable sample of several big cities. Nielsen does not count the audience for C-SPAN, which also showed the speech.

Last week, Nielsen said 38.4 million people watched Obama speak at a Denver stadium on the six commercial networks, along with BET, TV One, Univision and Telemundo — four networks that didn’t cover Palin’s speech. PBS added an estimated 4 million to that total.

Nearly 2 million more women were watching Palin than men, Nielsen said.

Viewers were far more interested in Palin than Democratic vice presidential candidate Joe Biden. Biden’s speech to Democrats last week was seen by an estimated 24 million people.

The audiences for the Obama and Palin speeches were bigger than the ones this year for the Academy Awards, the finale of “American Idol” or the Olympics opening ceremony in Beijing.

Nearly 120 million Americans voted in the 2004 presidential election and numbers could be higher this year because of young and minority voters attracted to Obama, and renewed enthusiasm among Republicans for their ticket.

No Obama 2012

Were Harry Reid’s private comments to President Obama racist?

rice392000 asked:


What’s Your Reaction? WASHINGTON — Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid apologized on Saturday for saying the race of Barack Obama – whom he described as a “light skinned” African-American “with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one” – would help rather than hurt his eventual presidential bid.

Obama quickly accepted, saying “As far as I am concerned, the book is closed.” Reid, facing a tough re-election bid this year, spent the day telephoning civil rights leaders and fellow Democrats in hopes of mitigating the political damage.

The revelations about Reid’s 2008 comments were included in the book “Game Change” by Time Magazine’s Mark Halperin and New York magazine’s John Heilemann. The behind-the-scenes look at the 2008 campaign that elevated Obama to the White House is based on the writers’ interviews with more than 200 sources, most of whom were granted anonymity and thus much of the material could not be immediately corroborated.

Among the details in the book:

_ Presidential rival Hillary Rodham Clinton said she believed Obama’s team had used out-of-state supporters to win the Iowa caucuses and had intentionally exploited Obama’s race. She said the country faced a “a terrible choice” between Obama and Republican nominee John McCain.

_ Obama and running mate Joe Biden barely spoke, kept separate schedules and seldom campaigned together. The campaign kept Biden off the nightly calls that included Obama, instead having the campaign manager and senior strategist brief Biden separately.

_ Aides to McCain described the difficulties they faced with their vice presidential pick, then-Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. Steve Schmidt, a senior adviser to McCain, is quoted telling Palin’s foreign policy tutors: “You guys have a lot of work to do. She doesn’t know anything.”

_ Former President Bill Clinton’s efforts to persuade Sen. Edward M. Kennedy to endorse his wife’s presidential bid fell flat when Clinton told the Democratic lawmaker that just a few years ago, Obama would have been serving the pair coffee

Caffeinated Content

Is this why the Democrats are so scared of Sarah Palin?

Warren T asked:


FROM DICK MORRIS:
For two weeks, Democrats and their media allies have leveled scorching fire at Sarah Palin. It’s not having much effect, but they keep at it anyway.

The latest Fox News poll shows Palin with a 54-27 favorable/unfavorable ratio, which compares well with Barack Obama’s 57-36, John McCain’s 60-33 and Joe Biden’s 51-29. (Of the four, she’s the most popular).

Why do Democrats feel so threatened? They’ve even stopped attacking McCain and President Bush to launch a vicious and sexist barrage at her that would normally make a feminist angry and a Democrat blush.

Basically, it’s this: John McCain only endangers Democratic chances of victory this November, but Sarah Palin is an existential threat to the Democratic Party.

She threatens a core element of the party’s base – women.

When an African-American like Clarence Thomas, Colin Powell or Condi Rice rises to prominence as a Republican, he or she endangers the Democratic coalition. So would a Republican labor leader.

And so, above all, does the woman Republican running for vice president.

Democrats can’t stomach seeing the feminist movement’s impetus for greater female political participation and empowerment “hijacked” by a pro-life woman who espouses traditional values. They must obliterate her, lest her popularity eat away at their party’s core.

So the Democrats are hysterical in their attacks on her. South Carolina’s Democratic Party chairwoman, Carol Fowler (wife of a national party chairman), said that the only qualification Palin had for vice president was that she hadn’t had an abortion. Tabloids are digging up dirt on Palin’s children. And liberal bloggers have suggested that Palin would neglect her children if she were elected (while the Democratic candidate has young children at home, too).

That liberals would resort to such blatant sexism shows their desperation.

But the Fox News poll of Sept. 8-9 indicates a deeper reality of Palin’s popularity. On the question of which of the four candidates best understands what day-to-day life is like in America, Palin finished first, with 33 percent. (Obama drew 32 percent, McCain 17 percent and Biden 10 percent.)

She’s not popular because she’s a radical feminist or pro-choice advocate. It’s because she understands what it’s like to be a woman in 21st century America.

She’s never ascended to the elite, so she doesn’t need to stoop to conquer as most well-heeled feminist leaders must. She lives far from the plastic pseudoreality where a fossilized ideology substitutes for human compassion and empathy. As such, she rises above the slogans of both the left and the right and proposes to bring to Washington a dose of reality – a taste of real life.

She may become the first woman in national office – yet the Democrats, feminists and liberals can’t control her, and that burns them up.

Elections come and go, but Palin is a far more fundamental threat to the Democratic Party. And that’s why they fear her so.

sarah palin fox news show

Did Palin receive call from the president of France?

delina_m asked:


Audio:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbEwKcs-7Hc

Sarah Palin Prank Phone Call Transcript
Sarah Palin: This is Sarah.

Masked Avengers: Ah, yeah, Gov. Palin.

Palin: Hello.

Avengers: Just hold on for President Sarkozy, one moment.

P: Oh, it’s not him yet, they’re saying. I always do that.

A: Yes, hello, Gov. Palin.

P: Hello, this is Sarah, how are you?

A: Fine, and you? This is Nicolas Sarkozy speaking, how are you?

P: Oh, it’s so good to hear you. Thank you for calling us.

A: Oh, it’s a pleasure.

P: Thank you sir, we have such great respect for you, John McCain and I. We love you and thank you for taking a few minutes to talk to me.

A: I follow your campaigns closely with my special American adviser Johnny Hallyday(Factcheck: actually a french singer / actor), you know?

P: Yes, good.

A: Excellent. Are you confident?

P: Very confident and we’re thankful that polls are showing that the race is tightening and…

A: Well I know very well that the campaign can be exhausting. How do you feel right now, my dear?

P: I feel so good. I feel like we’re in a marathon and at the very end of the marathon you get your second wind and you plow to the finish.

A: You see, I got elected in France because I’m real and you seem to be someone who’s real, as well.

P: Yes, yeah. Nico, we so appreciate this opportunity.

A: You know I see you as a president one day, too.

P: Maybe in eight years.

A: Well, I hope for you. You know, we have a lot in common because personally one of my favourite activities is to hunt, too.

P: Oh, very good. We should go hunting together.

A: Exactly, we could try go hunting by helicopter like you did. I never did that. Like we say in French, on pourrait tuer des bebe phoque s, aussi.(Translation: “One could kill out all the baby seals, too”.)

P: Well, I think we could have a lot of fun together while we’re getting work done. We can kill two birds with one stone that way.

A: I just love killing those animals. Mmm, mmm, take away life, that is so fun. I’d really love to go, so long as we don’t bring along Vice-President Cheney.

P: No, I’ll be a careful shot, yes.

A: Yes, you know we have a lot in common also, because except from my house I can see Belgium. That’s kind of less interesting than you.

P: Well, see, we’re right next door to different countries that we all need to be working with, yes.

A: Some people said in the last days and I thought that was mean that you weren’t experienced enough in foreign relations and you know that’s completely false. That’s the thing that I said to my great friend, the prime minister of Canada Stef Carse…(FACT CHECK: Not prime minister – but a singer – shouldn’t she know who the PM of Canada really is though?).

P: Well, he’s doing fine, too, and yeah, when you come into a position underestimated it gives you an opportunity to prove the pundits and the critics wrong. You work that much harder.

A: I was wondering because you are so next to him, one of my good friends, the prime minister of Quebec, Mr. Richard Z. Sirois (Fact check: Quebec comedian and radio host), have you met him recently? Did he come to one of your rallies?

P: I haven’t seen him at one of the rallies but it’s been great working with the Canadian officials. I know as governor we have a great co-operative effort there as we work on all of our resource-development projects. You know, I look forward to working with you and getting to meet you personally and your beautiful wife. Oh my goodness, you’ve added a lot of energy to your country with that beautiful family of yours.

A: Thank you very much. You know my wife Carla would love to meet you, even though you know she was a bit jealous that I was supposed to speak to you today.

P: Well, give her a big hug for me.

A: You know my wife is a popular singer and a former top model and she’s so hot in bed. She even wrote a song for you.

P: Oh my goodness, I didn’t know that.

A: Yes, in French it’s called de rouge a levre sur un cochon, or if you prefer in English, Joe the Plumber…it’s his life, Joe the Plumber. (Really translates to: “of lipstick on a pig”)

P: Maybe she understands some of the unfair criticism but I bet you she is such a hard worker, too, and she realizes you just plow through that criticism.

A: I just want to be sure. That phenomenon Joe the Plumber. That’s not your husband, right?

P: That’s not my husband but he’s a normal American who just works hard and doesn’t want government to take his money.

A: Yes, yes, I understand we have the equivalent of Joe the Plumber in France. It’s called Marcel, the guy with bread under his armpit.

P: Right, that’s what it’s all about, the middle class and government needing to work for them. You’re a very good example for us here.

A: I see a bit about NBC, even Fox News wasn’t an ally as much as usual.

P: Yeah, that’s what we’re up against.

A: Gov. Palin, I love the documentary t
A: Gov. Palin, I love the documentary they made on your life. You know Hustler’s Nailin’ Paylin? (Fact Check: A Porn Parody on Sarah Pailin. Read more…)

P: Ohh, good, thank you, yes.

A: That was really edgy.

P: Well, good.

A: I really loved you and I must say something also, governor, you’ve been pranked by the Masked Avengers. We are two comedians from Montreal.

P: Ohhh, have we been pranked? And what radio station is this?

A: CKOI in Montreal.

P: In Montreal? Tell me the radio station call letters.

A: CK…hello?
It was for real and her campaign even issued a statement on her behalf
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/01/masked-avengers-prank-cal_n_140023.html

No Obama 2012

LOL! The McCain Campaign Calls Palin a DIVA?

RobNyack asked:


do we need any more proof that this woman is a total moron? This is someone you do not want even close to the reigns of power.

The McCain camp is at war with one another and it involved Dingbat Palin. A McCain adviser said Palin is “going rouge” and another McCain advisor says,

“She is a diva. She takes no advice from anyone,” said this McCain adviser. “She does not have any relationships of trust with any of us, her family or anyone else.”

What a freiking nightmare this woman is. John McCain did not deserve this. What must he be thinking?? Unfortunately, this is a mess he made. BAD JUDGEMENT, John.

http://news.aol.com/elections/article/palin-going-rogue-mccain-aide-says/225713?icid=200100397×1211754840x1200713082

Should John just dump her now with 10 days left? If he does that, she’ll probably take off with $150,000 in clothes!

palin going rouge

5/5/2009,Poll: Rush Limbaugh praises Sarah Palin as the “articulate voice” of conservatism, that’s great?

Ryan C asked:


Do you agree or disagree?

Rush Limbaugh, accurately, states: “Clearly, in last year’s campaign, the most prominent, articulate voice for standard, run-of-the-mill, good old-fashioned conservatism was Sarah Palin.” See http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/05/04/palin-officially-joins-gop-rebranding-effort/ , http://www.poligazette.com/2009/05/05/limbaugh-jeb-and-romney-hate-palin/ . Accordingly, that is why John McCain that of their “Over 50 million” votes, people voted “mostly for Sarah Palin.” See http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/03/26/mccain-people-voted-mostly-for-sarah-palin-last-year/ . In fact, evidence establishes that McCain was the downer on that ticket.

However, sadly, Rush Limbaugh is right that people like Mitt Romney, who aspires to the next President of the United States, is already starting to take jabs at Honorable Sarah Palin because they fear her winning 2012 Republican nominee, that’s dirty. Sarah Palin has not said anything negative, so far, about Romney, Bush, etc.

I love it when Honorable Sarah Palin receives praises.

What’s your political party and gender?

No Obama 2012

Next Page »