Did the Clinton Clan do this?
Ann Coulter
Bill Clinton’s New Glow Job
by Ann Coulter
Posted Oct 11, 2006
Text Size: S M L
printer-friendly
forward to a friend
email the editor
share your comments
digg this story
I Did Not Have Sex With That Nomad, Osama Bin Laden
Are Videotaped Beheadings Covered by Geneva?
If Only Bin Laden Had a Stained Blue Dress…
Joe Wilson: The End of an Error
With the Democrats’ full-throated moralizing of late, I’m almost tempted to vote for them — although perhaps “full-throated” is the wrong phrase to use with regard to Democrats and sex scandals. The sudden emergence of the Swift Butt Veterans for Truth demonstrates that the Democrats would prefer to talk about anything other than national security.
Unfortunately for them, the psychotic Kim Jong Il seems to be setting off nukes, raising the embarrassing issue of the Clinton administration’s 1994 “peace” deal with North Korea.
At least with former Rep. Mark Foley, you could say the Democrats’ hypocritical grandstanding was just politics. But in the case of North Korea, Democrats are resorting to bald-faced lies.
Current New Mexico governor and former Clinton administration official Bill Richardson has been on tour, bragging about the groundbreaking Clinton administration negotiations with North Korea — keeping his fingers crossed that no one has access to news from 1994.
In 1994, the Clinton administration got a call from Jimmy Carter — probably collect — who was with the then-leader of North Korea, saying: “Hey, Kim Il Sung is a total stud, and I’ve worked out a terrific deal. I’ll give you the details later.”
Clinton promptly signed the deal, so he could forget about North Korea and get back to cheating on Hillary. Mission accomplished.
Under the terms of the “agreed framework,” we gave North Korea all sorts of bribes — more than $5 billion worth of oil, two nuclear reactors and lots of high technology. In return, they took the bribes and kept building nukes. This wasn’t difficult, inasmuch as the 1994 deal permitted the North Koreans to evade weapons inspectors for the next five years.
Yes, you read that right: North Korea promised not to develop nukes, and we showed how much we trusted them by agreeing to no weapons inspections for five years.
The famed “allies,” whom liberals claim they are so interested in pleasing, went ballistic at this cave-in to North Korea. Japan and South Korea — actual allies, unlike France and Germany — were furious. Even Hans Blix thought we were being patsies.
If you need any more evidence that it was a rotten deal, The New York Times hailed it as “a resounding triumph.”
At the time, people like William Safire were screaming from the rooftops that allowing North Korea to escape weapons inspections for five years would “preclude a pre-emptive strike by us if North Korea, in the next U.S. president’s administration, breaks its agreement to freeze additional bomb-making.”
And then on Oct. 17, 2002 — under a new administration, you’ll note — The New York Times reported on the front page, so you couldn’t have missed it: “Confronted by new American intelligence, North Korea has admitted that it has been conducting a major clandestine nuclear weapons development program for the past several years.”
So when it comes to North Korea, I believe the Democrats might want to maintain a discreet silence, lest anyone ask, “Hey, did you guys do anything with North Korea?”
But by Richardson’s lights, the only reason Kim Jong Il is testing nukes is because Bush called him evil. He said, “When you call him axis of evil or a tyrant, you know, he just goes crazy.” This is the sort of idiocy you expect to hear from an illiterate like Keith Olbermann, not someone who might know people who read newspapers.
Richardson also blames the war in Iraq, bleating that the poor North Koreans feel “that there’s too much attention on the Middle East, on Iraq. So it’s a cry for attention.” If Kim just wanted our attention, he could have started dating Lindsay Lohan. But Richardson says Kim “psychologically feels he’s been dissed, that he’s not treated with respect.”
Damn that Bush! If only he had ignored the crazy Muslims and dedicated himself into sending flowers (and more nuclear reactors!) to North Korea, we could be actively helping Kim develop his nukes like the Clinton administration did.
As Richardson said, Kim “wants us to negotiate with him directly, as we did in the Clinton administration.”
To go on TV and propose negotiating with North Korea like Clinton did without ever mentioning that North Korea cheated on that agreement before the ink was dry would be like denouncing American aggression against Japan in 1942 and neglecting to mention Pearl Harbor. Anyone who is either that stupid or that disingenuous should not be allowed on TV.
When pressed by CNN’s Anderson Cooper about the failed deal, Richardson lied, claiming the 1994 deal prevented the North Koreans from building nukes “for eight years” — i.e., right up until the day The New York Times reported the North Koreans had been developing nukes “for the past several years.”
Kim is crazier than any leader even South America has been able to produce. In fact, he’s so crazy, we might be able to get the Democrats to take action. Someone tell Nancy Pelosi that the “Dear Leader” is an actual pederast. Then we’ll at least be able to read his instant messages.
The question is “Did the Clinton Clan do this” . So far all I have is a critique of Ann Coulter, not a rebuttal of the article.
Golf Advice
Making all the right moves, Obama Risky Business!
Obama has been making all the right moves lately, while talking a good game for the future. It appears that Bill Richardson will be named secretary of commerce( does he have to name every democratic nominee to a position). Hillary was confirmed as the Secretary of State as we all expected, much to the delight of Bill who is calling all the old girls back saying “bill is back in Washington”.
I do wonder why we have to have a weekly press conference, like we forgot who he was or something! Today’s announcement was his pledge to work with governors to fix the economy. Good idea when you talk about yet will he really listen to the likes of Sarah Palin and others! I would love to here the conversation in the next couple of days when Palin and Obama meat up again.
Palin has been steadily on the campaign trail this week for Saxby Chambliss lets hope everyone turns out to vote in Georgia. Early results from exit polls showed Saxby ahead, on average voter turnout. Hope to see the evening votes trend the same way…
Hillary to be Secretary of State?
Would that make all of Hillary’s supporters happy! They all wanted her in the White house all along. To put her in a prominent position just makes sense. This sets her up for a 2016 run for president. She gets to stay in the Obama spotlight and could help push his agenda. They would for one work well together she likes to get things done he likes to talk about them.
This would leave some of Obama’s supporters that really got him elected out in the cold.
1: John Kerry Seemed like the most likely choice all along but most likely he started to talk and Obama got bored and forgot he was there.
2: Bill Richardson would be a strong choice and really turned his back on the Clinton’s to support Obama. We here at 2012Obama really thought he would be the choice. Obama really likes change so who knows….
The question we ask always is who helps him the most in 2012? One would have to think it has to be Hillary, I would say it ups the odds of reelection 5 points. I will have my staff run the numbers but I see it only helping.



(4.63 out of 5)